This site shows a whole essay as an example of just how to structure your articles


This site shows a whole essay as an example of just how to structure your articles

Example academic essay

Example academic essay: The Death Penalty. This essay shows many features that are important commonly appear in essays.

Should the death penalty be restored in the UK?

The restoration regarding the death penalty for serious crimes is a concern of debate in the UK because of the recent rise in violent crime. The reasons, effects and solutions to the nagging problems of violent crime throw up a number of complex issues which are further complicated in addition that crime is reported. Newspapers often sensationalise crime to be able to increase circulation and also this makes objective discussion more difficult. This essay will firstly examine this topic by considering the arguments put forward by those who work in favour associated with death penalty and then by taking a look at the arguments opposed to the concept.

The key arguments in favour of restoring the death penalty are the ones of deterrence and retribution: the theory is that people will be dissuaded from violent crime that they gave out to others if they know they will face the ultimate punishment and that people should face the same treatment. Statistics show that after the death penalty was temporarily withdrawn in Britain between 1965 and 1969 the murder rate increased by 125% (Clark, 2005). However, we must think about the possibility that other reasons might have lead to this rise. Amnesty International (1996) claims it is impractical to prove that capital punishment is a better deterrent than being given a full life sentence in prison and that “evidence….gives no support to the evidence hypothesis theory.” It seems at the best that the deterrence theory is yet to be proven. The thought of ‘retribution’ is a fascinating one: there was a appeal that is basic the straightforward phrase ‘the punishment should fit the crime’. Calder (2003) neatly summarises this argument as he says that killers give up their rights if they kill and therefore if punishments are too lenient then it reveals that we undervalue the ability to live. There are some other points too meant for the death penalty, one of these simple cost that is being. It is obviously far cheaper essay writer to execute prisoners promply rather than feed and house them for a long time at a stretch.

The arguments up against the death penalty are mainly ethical within their nature, it sends out the wrong message to the rest of the country that it is basically wrong to kill and that when the state kills. Webber (2005) claims that the death penalty makes people believe that ‘killing people is morally permissable’. This really is an argument that is interesting can you teach children not to hit by hitting them? Wouldn’t this instead suggest to them that hitting was indeed ‘permissable’? Additionally there is the truth that you might execute innocent people. Innocent people can invariably be released from prison, nevertheless they can’t ever be cut back through the dead. When individuals have now been killed there is absolutely no chance of rehabilitation or criminals attempting to make up for crimes. Because of this good reason capital punishment has been called ‘the bluntest of blunt instruments’ (Clark, 2005).

In conclusion, the arguments put forward by people who support or are contrary to the death penalty often reflect their deeper principles and beliefs. These beliefs and principles are deeply rooted in life experiences in addition to real way individuals are brought up and so are unlikely to be swayed by clever arguments. It is interesting that in this national country many people are in preference of the death penalty yet parliament continues to oppose it. In this situation it can be argued that parliament is leading the way in upholding human rights and will continue to broadcast the clear message that killing is definitely wrong.

You need to be able to see that this essay consists of:

An introduction in three parts:
1. A sentence saying why this issue is intriguing and relevant.
2. A sentence (or two) mentioning the down sides and issues involved in the topic.
3. An outline associated with essay.

Main paragraphs with:
1. An interest sentence which provides a main idea/argument which informs us what your whole paragraph is all about.
2. Evidence from outside sources which support the argument(s) put forward when you look at the sentence that is topic.
3. Some personal input from the author analysing the points put forward in the topic sentence additionally the outside sources.

A conclusion:
Summarises the points that are main gives a solution to the question.

C'è 1 comment

Add yours